Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Virus variant-specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022.
Wagenhäuser, Isabell; Knies, Kerstin; Hofmann, Daniela; Rauschenberger, Vera; Eisenmann, Michael; Reusch, Julia; Gabel, Alexander; Flemming, Sven; Andres, Oliver; Petri, Nils; Topp, Max S; Papsdorf, Michael; McDonogh, Miriam; Verma-Führing, Raoul; Scherzad, Agmal; Zeller, Daniel; Böhm, Hartmut; Gesierich, Anja; Seitz, Anna K; Kiderlen, Michael; Gawlik, Micha; Taurines, Regina; Wurmb, Thomas; Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo; Forster, Johannes; Weismann, Dirk; Weißbrich, Benedikt; Dölken, Lars; Liese, Johannes; Kaderali, Lars; Kurzai, Oliver; Vogel, Ulrich; Krone, Manuel.
  • Wagenhäuser I; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Knies K; Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Hofmann D; Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Rauschenberger V; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Eisenmann M; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Reusch J; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Gabel A; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Flemming S; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Andres O; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Petri N; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Topp MS; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Papsdorf M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • McDonogh M; Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Verma-Führing R; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Scherzad A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Zeller D; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Böhm H; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Gesierich A; Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Seitz AK; Department of Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Kiderlen M; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Gawlik M; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Taurines R; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Wurmb T; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Ernestus RI; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Forster J; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Weismann D; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Weißbrich B; Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Dölken L; Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Liese J; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Kaderali L; Institute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Kurzai O; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans-Knoell-Institute, Jena, Germany.
  • Vogel U; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Krone M; Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: kron
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 2022 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236729
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Consequently, RDTs have been established as an alternative and additional diagnostic strategy to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, reliable clinical and large-scale performance data specific to a SARS-CoV-2 virus variant of concern (VOC) are limited, especially for the Omicron VOC. The aim of this study was to compare RDT performance among different VOCs.

METHODS:

This single-centre prospective performance assessment compared RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) with RT-qPCR including deduced standardized viral load from oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinical point-of-care setting from November 2020 to January 2022.

RESULTS:

Among 35 479 RDT/RT-qPCR tandems taken from 26 940 individuals, 164 of the 426 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples tested true positive with an RDT corresponding to an RDT sensitivity of 38.50% (95% CI, 34.00-43.20%), with an overall specificity of 99.67% (95% CI, 99.60-99.72%). RDT sensitivity depended on viral load, with decreasing sensitivity accompanied by descending viral load. VOC-dependent sensitivity assessment showed a sensitivity of 42.86% (95% CI, 32.82-53.52%) for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2, 43.42% (95% CI, 32.86-54.61%) for the Alpha VOC, 37.67% (95% CI, 30.22-45.75%) for the Delta VOC, and 33.67% (95% CI, 25.09-43.49%) for the Omicron VOC. Sensitivity in samples with high viral loads of ≥106 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per mL was significantly lower in the Omicron VOC (50.00%; 95% CI, 36.12-63.88%) than in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (79.31%; 95% CI, 61.61-90.15%; p 0.015).

DISCUSSION:

RDT sensitivity for detection of the Omicron VOC is reduced in individuals infected with a high viral load, which curtails the effectiveness of RDTs. This aspect furthert limits the use of RDTs, although RDTs are still an irreplaceable diagnostic tool for rapid, economic point-of-care and extensive SARS-CoV-2 screening.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Language: English Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Microbiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.cmi.2022.08.006

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Language: English Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Microbiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.cmi.2022.08.006