Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Optimizing sample collection methods for detection of respiratory viruses in poultry housing environments.
Mo, Jongseo; Stephens, Christopher B; Jordan, Brian; Ritz, Casey; Swayne, David E; Spackman, Erica.
  • Mo J; Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia.
  • Stephens CB; Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia.
  • Jordan B; Department of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
  • Ritz C; Department of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
  • Swayne DE; Department of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
  • Spackman E; Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 69(5): e2111-e2121, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053006
ABSTRACT
Viral respiratory diseases, such as avian influenza, Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis and infectious laryngotracheitis, have considerable negative economic implications for poultry. Ensuring the virus-free status of premises by environmental sampling after cleaning and disinfection is essential for lifting a quarantine and/or safely restocking the premises following an outbreak. The objectives of this study were to identify optimal sample collection devices and to determine the locations in poultry housing which are best for poultry respiratory virus sample collection. Chickens exposed to infectious bronchitis virus, which was used as a representative virus for enveloped poultry respiratory viruses, were housed in floor-pens in either a curtain-sided wood framed house or a cement block house. Foam swabs, cellulose sponges, polyester swabs, dry cotton gauze and pre-moistened cotton gauze were evaluated for comparative efficiency in recovering viral RNA. Cotton gauze pre-moistened with the viral transport media had the highest sensitivity among the devices (wood-framed house 78% positive, geometric mean titre [GMT] of 2.6 log10 50% egg infectious doses [EID50 ] equivalents/ml; cement block houses 55% positive, GMT of 1.7 log10 EID50 equivalents/ml). Targeting virus deposition sites is also crucial for efficient virus elimination procedures and subsequent testing; therefore, 10 locations within the houses were compared for virus detection. In both housing types, the highest viral RNA loads were recovered from the tops of drinker lines within the pen. Places the chickens could contact directly (e.g., feeder rim) or were contacted by caretaker feet (hallway floor) also yielded higher levels of viral RNA more consistently. These results will facilitate the establishment of efficient environmental sampling procedures for respiratory viruses of poultry.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Influenza in Birds Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tbed.14547

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Influenza in Birds Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tbed.14547