Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Patient-initiated cardiovascular monitoring with commercially available devices: How useful is it in a cardiology outpatient setting? Mixed methods, observational study.
A'Court, Christine; Jenkins, Wilfred; Reidy, Claire; Papoutsi, Chrysanthi.
  • A'Court C; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Jenkins W; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Reidy C; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Papoutsi C; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. chrysanthi.papoutsi@phc.ox.ac.uk.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 22(1): 428, 2022 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053861
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The availability, affordability and utilisation of commercially available self-monitoring devices is increasing, but their impact on routine clinical decision-making remains little explored. We sought to examine how patient-generated cardiovascular data influenced clinical evaluation in UK cardiology outpatient clinics and to understand clinical attitudes and experiences with using data from commercially available self-monitoring devices.

METHODS:

Mixed methods study combining a) quantitative and qualitative content analysis of 1373 community cardiology clinic letters, recording consultations between January-September 2020 including periods with different Covid-19 related restrictions, and b) semi-structured qualitative interviews and group discussions with 20 cardiology-affiliated clinicians at the same NHS Trust.

RESULTS:

Patient-generated cardiovascular data were described in 185/1373 (13.5%) clinic letters overall, with the proportion doubling following onset of the first Covid-19 lockdown in England, from 8.3% to 16.6% (p < 0.001). In 127/185 (69%) cases self-monitored data were found to provide or facilitate cardiac diagnoses (34/127); assist management of previously diagnosed cardiac conditions (55/127); be deployed for cardiovascular prevention (16/127); or be recommended for heart rhythm evaluation (10/127). In 58/185 (31%) cases clinicians did not put the self-monitored data to any evident use and in 12/185 (6.5%) cases patient-generated data prompted an unnecessary referral. In interviews and discussions, clinicians expressed mixed views on patient-generated data but foresaw a need to embrace and plan for this information flow, and proactively address challenges with integration into traditional care pathways.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study suggests patient-generated data are being used for clinical decision-making in ad hoc and opportunistic ways. Given shifts towards remote monitoring in clinical care, accelerated by the pandemic, there is a need to consider how best to incorporate patient-generated data in clinical processes, introduce relevant training, pathways and governance frameworks, and manage associated risks.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiology / Cardiovascular System / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12872-022-02860-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiology / Cardiovascular System / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12872-022-02860-x