Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telehealth has comparable outcomes to in-person diabetic foot care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kamaratos-Sevdalis, Nikolaos; Kamaratos, Alexandros; Papadakis, Marios; Tsagkaris, Christos.
  • Kamaratos-Sevdalis N; Diabetic Foot Clinic, Diabetes Center and 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18536, Greece.
  • Kamaratos A; Diabetic Foot Clinic, Diabetes Center and 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18536, Greece.
  • Papadakis M; Surgery II, University of Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal 42283, Germany. marios_papadakis@yahoo.gr.
  • Tsagkaris C; Diabetic Foot Clinic, Diabetes Center and 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18536, Greece.
World J Methodol ; 12(4): 285-292, 2022 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2056139
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed obstacles to the delivery of diabetic foot care. In response to this remote healthcare services have been deployed offering monitoring, follow-up, and referral services to patients with diabetic foot ulcers and related conditions. Although, remote diabetic foot care has been studied before the COVID-19 pandemic as an alternative to in-person care, the peculiar situation of the pandemic, which dictates that remote care would be the sole available option for healthcare practitioners and patients, necessitates an evaluation of the relevant knowledge obtained since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak.

AIM:

To perform a thorough search in PubMed/Medline and Cochrane to identify original records on the topic.

METHODS:

To identify relevant peer-reviewed publications and gray literature, the authors searched PubMed-MEDLINE and Cochrane Library-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials starting September 27 till October 31, 2021. The reference lists of the selected sources and relevant systematic reviews were also hand-searched to identify potentially relevant resources. Otherwise, the authors searched Reference Citation Analysis (https//www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).

RESULTS:

A number of randomized prospective studies, case series, and case reports have shown that the effectiveness of remote care is comparable to in-person care in terms of hospitalizations, amputations, and mortality. The level of satisfaction of patients' receiving this type of care was high. The cost of remote healthcare was not significantly lower than in - person care though.

CONCLUSION:

It is noteworthy that remote care during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be more effective and well - received than remote care in the past. Nevertheless, larger studies spanning over longer time intervals are necessary in order to validate these results and provide additional insights.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: World J Methodol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wjm.v12.i4.285

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: World J Methodol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wjm.v12.i4.285