Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam: Results from a pilot study.
Vink, Martijn; Iglói, Zsófia; Fanoy, Ewout B; van Beek, Janko; Boelsums, Timo; de Graaf, Miranda; Voeten, Helene A C M; Molenkamp, Richard; Koopmans, Marion Pg; Mevissen, Fraukje Ef.
  • Vink M; Public Health Service (GGD) Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Iglói Z; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Fanoy EB; Public Health Service (GGD) Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Beek J; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Boelsums T; Public Health Service (GGD) Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Graaf M; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Voeten HACM; Public Health Service (GGD) Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Molenkamp R; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Koopmans MP; Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Mevissen FE; Public Health Service (GGD) Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Glob Health ; 12: 05042, 2022 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2056226
ABSTRACT

Background:

High incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and low testing uptake were reported in low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam. We aimed to improve willingness and access to testing by introducing community-based test facilities, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a rapid antigen detection test (RDT).

Methods:

Two to eleven test facilities operated consecutively in three low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam, offering the options of walk-in or appointments. Background characteristics were collected at intake and one nasopharyngeal swab was taken and processed using both RDT and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Visitors were asked to join a survey for evaluation purposes.

Results:

In total, 19 773 visitors were tested - 9662 (48.9%) without an appointment. Walk-in visitors were older, lived more often in the proximity of the test facilities, and reported coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related symptoms less often than by-appointment visitors. For 67.7% of the visitors, this was the first time they got tested. A total of 1211 (6.1%) tested SARS-CoV-2-positive with RT-PCR, of whom 309 (25.5%) were asymptomatic. Test uptake increased among residents of the pilot neighbourhoods, especially in the older age groups, compared to people living in comparable neighbourhoods without community-based testing facilities. RDT detected asymptomatic individuals with 71.8% sensitivity, which was acceptable in this high prevalence setting. Visitors reported positive attitudes towards the test facilities and welcomed the easy access.

Conclusions:

Offering community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing seems a promising approach for increasing testing uptake among specific populations in low-income neighbourhoods.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: J Glob Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jogh.12.05042

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: J Glob Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jogh.12.05042