Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Increasingly polarised or finding common ground? Exploring pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric on two South African Facebook pages
Journal of Science Communication ; 21(5), 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2056787
ABSTRACT
We investigated pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric on two South African Facebook pages to identify the nature, sources and justifications of the vaccine-related claims published on these pages. Our dataset consisted of 440 Facebook posts made by page administrators during 2019. Statements related to the safety and necessity of vaccines dominated the pro-vaccine page, while the anti-vaccine page focussed primarily on claims about the dangers of vaccines. Posts on both pages frequently contained content shared from within Facebook, with much of the content originating from the United States. Both pages made equal use of scientific justifications (i.e. published journal articles) to support claims, and most of these articles were published in accredited journals. The authors hope that a better understanding of the nature, sources and justifications of pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric may lead to more constructive dialogue about vaccines, including the ongoing debate about COVID-19 vaccines © The Author(s). This article is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution — NonCommercial — NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 License
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: Scopus Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: Journal of Science Communication Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: Scopus Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: Journal of Science Communication Year: 2022 Document Type: Article