Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Misrepresentation and Nonadherence Regarding COVID-19 Public Health Measures.
Levy, Andrea Gurmankin; Thorpe, Alistair; Scherer, Laura D; Scherer, Aaron M; Drews, Frank A; Butler, Jorie M; Burpo, Nicole; Shoemaker, Holly; Stevens, Vanessa; Fagerlin, Angela.
  • Levy AG; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Middlesex Community College, Middletown, Connecticut.
  • Thorpe A; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
  • Scherer LD; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
  • Scherer AM; Veterans Affairs (VA) Denver Center for Innovation, Denver, Colorado.
  • Drews FA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa School of Medicine, Iowa City.
  • Butler JM; Department of Psychology, University of Utah College of Social and Behavioral Science, Salt Lake City.
  • Burpo N; Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Shoemaker H; Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Stevens V; Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Fagerlin A; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(10): e2235837, 2022 10 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2059204
ABSTRACT
Importance The effectiveness of public health measures implemented to mitigate the spread and impact of SARS-CoV-2 relies heavily on honesty and adherence from the general public.

Objective:

To examine the frequency of, reasons for, and factors associated with misrepresentation and nonadherence regarding COVID-19 public health measures. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This survey study recruited a national, nonprobability sample of US adults to participate in an online survey using Qualtrics online panels (participation rate, 1811 of 2260 [80.1%]) from December 8 to 23, 2021. The survey contained screening questions to allow for a targeted sample of one-third who had had COVID-19, one-third who had not had COVID-19 and were vaccinated, and one-third who had not had COVID-19 and were unvaccinated. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The survey assessed 9 different types of misrepresentation and nonadherence related to COVID-19 public health measures and the reasons underlying such behaviors. Additional questions measured COVID-19-related beliefs and behaviors and demographic characteristics.

Results:

The final sample included 1733 participants. The mean (SD) participant age was 41 (15) years and the sample predominantly identified as female (1143 of 1732 [66.0%]) and non-Hispanic White (1151 of 1733 [66.4%]). Seven hundred twenty-one participants (41.6%) reported misrepresentation and/or nonadherence in at least 1 of the 9 items; telling someone they were with or about to be with in person that they were taking more COVID-19 preventive measures than they actually were (420 of 1726 [24.3%]) and breaking quarantine rules (190 of 845 [22.5%]) were the most common manifestations. The most commonly endorsed reasons included wanting life to feel normal and wanting to exercise personal freedom. All age groups younger than 60 years (eg, odds ratio for those aged 18-29 years, 4.87 [95% CI, 3.27-7.34]) and those who had greater distrust in science (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]) had significantly higher odds of misrepresentation and/or nonadherence for at least 1 of the 9 items. Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of US adults, nearly half of participants reported misrepresentation and/or nonadherence regarding public health measures against COVID-19. Future work is needed to examine strategies for communicating the consequences of misrepresentation and nonadherence and to address contributing factors.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: English Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article