Your browser doesn't support javascript.
An 18-month follow-up of the Covid-19 psychology research consortium study panel: Survey design and fieldwork procedures for Wave 6.
McBride, Orla; Butter, Sarah; Martinez, Anton P; Shevlin, Mark; Murphy, Jamie; Hartman, Todd K; McKay, Ryan; Hyland, Philip; Bennett, Kate M; Stocks, Thomas V A; Gibson-Miller, Jilly; Levita, Liat; Mason, Liam; Bentall, Richard P.
  • McBride O; Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Butter S; Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Martinez AP; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Shevlin M; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Murphy J; Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Hartman TK; Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • McKay R; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Hyland P; Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
  • Bennett KM; Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
  • Stocks TVA; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Gibson-Miller J; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Levita L; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Mason L; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Bentall RP; University College London, London, UK.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; : e1949, 2022 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239517
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Established in March 2020, the C19PRC Study monitors the psychological and socio-economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 6 (August-September 2021).

METHODS:

The survey assessed COVID-19 related experiences; experiences of common mental health disorders; psychological characteristics; and social and political attitudes. Adult participants from any previous wave (N = 3170) were re-invited, and sample replenishment procedures helped manage attrition. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the on-going original panel (from baseline) was nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, amongst other factors.

RESULTS:

1643 adults were re-interviewed at Wave 6 (51.8% retention rate). Non-participation was higher younger adults, those born outside UK, and adults living in cities. Of the adults recruited at baseline, 54.3% (N = 1100) participated in Wave 6. New respondent (N = 415) entered the panel at this wave, resulting in cross-sectional sample for Wave 6 of 2058 adults. The raking procedure re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1.3% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS:

This paper outlines the growing strength of the publicly available C19PRC Study data for COVID-19-related interdisciplinary research.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article