Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COMPARISON OF HIGHER VERSUS LOWER DOSE STEROID ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 AND ACUTE HYPOXEMIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE ON INHALED EPOPROSTENOL
Chest ; 162(4):A911-A912, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2060726
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE Critical Care Management of COVID-19 SESSION TYPE Original Investigations PRESENTED ON 10/17/2022 0130 pm - 0230 pm

PURPOSE:

Superimposed bacterial co-infection is common among patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Incidence of any superimposed infection ranges from 0% to 40%. Up to 50% of COVID-19 patients who died, had concomitant bacterial or fungal infection. Steroids are recommended for the treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19 and are thought to mitigate inflammatory organ injury. This retrospective study explores a subset of COVID-19 patients receiving Epoprostenol (iEPO) for AHRF and compared two different steroid treatment strategies and the impact on patient outcomes.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of 101 COVID-19 patients with AHRF receiving iEPO and systemic steroids. Patients in the high dose steroid group (n=59) received a minimum of dexamethasone 20mg daily or solumedrol 100mg daily while the standard dose steroid group (n=52) were those who received any lower dose. Patients that were DNR/I were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of bacterial co-infection defined by positive cultures. Secondary outcome was mortality.

RESULTS:

Results showed that patients treated with high dose steroids were older (66.77±11.17 vs 60.33±14.49, p0.006) and received a longer treatment course (18 days (12-25) vs 12.5 days (10-17), p 0.004). Univariate and Multivariate analysis showed that higher dose steroids were not associated with increased risk of superimposed bacterial infection (OR 0.96, CI (0.34-2.66), p0.93). The duration of steroids, regardless of the dose, was associated with increased risk of superimposed bacterial infection (OR 1.06, CI (1.01-1.13), p0.033). When adjusted for comorbidities and inflammatory state, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with high dose compared to standard dose steroids (OR 3.60, CI (0.65-19.93), p0.14). A longer duration of steroids was associated with a trend towards improved mortality (OR 0.93, CI (0.87-1.00), p0.072).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests that the duration of steroids, rather than dosage, had an effect on patient outcomes. There was no difference in bacterial co-infection rates between the two groups, but infection rates were increased among those who received a longer course of steroid treatment. There was a trend towards lower mortality with increased steroid duration, however, this did not reach statistical significance. Given this trend towards lower mortality, future prospective studies should investigate steroid duration to determine if a longer course of treatment leads to better outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and refractory AHRF. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Based on our study, patients should not receive a higher dose or longer duration of steroid treatment given the increased risk of bacterial infection with no definitive improvement in mortality. DISCLOSURES No relevant relationships by Natasha Garg No relevant relationships by Abhinav Hoskote No relevant relationships by Raymonde Jean No relevant relationships by Arpanjeet Kaur No relevant relationships by Sara Luby No relevant relationships by Omar Mahmoud No relevant relationships by Maria Athena Riego No relevant relationships by Edith Robin No relevant relationships by James Salonia No relevant relationships by DISHANT SHAH No relevant relationships by Venus Sharma No relevant relationships by Elizabeth Zipf
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Chest Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Chest Year: 2022 Document Type: Article