Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prevalence of physical activity using validated tools among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Eastern Mediterranean region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Albelbeisi, Ahmed Hassan; Arab-Zozani, Morteza; Nemati, Marjan Khabiri; Shaqfa, Khalil Mostafa; Kakemam, Edris.
  • Albelbeisi AH; Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences-International Campus (TUMS-IC), Tehran, Iran.
  • Arab-Zozani M; Medical Services Directorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine.
  • Nemati MK; Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
  • Shaqfa KM; Department of Health Management, Faculty of Management and Medical Information, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Kakemam E; General Directorate of Nursing, Palestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza Strip, Palestine.
SAGE Open Med ; 10: 20503121221118712, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2064697
ABSTRACT
Many interventions have been taken around the world to limit the spread of COVID-19. These interventions have affected people's lifestyles such as physical activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of physical activity using validated tools among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Eastern Mediterranean region. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted in October 2021. We searched three electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed) for English-language original articles of observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies) with original data reporting the prevalence of physical activity among adults in 22 countries from EMR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hoy's risk of Bias tool was applied to assess the biases in individual studies. The result was reported as a percentage for prevalence. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect model with a 95% confidence interval. A total of 363 articles were retrieved. Finally, 15 articles were selected and included in the statistical analysis. The selected studies included 16,585 participants. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the overall physical activity was 51.6% (95% confidence interval 42.1, 61 p = 0.745). The result of subgroup analysis based on different tools was 60.2%, 39.5%, 36.3%, 39.4%, and 55.2% for Global Physical Activity Questionnaire , The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-BREF, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form, respectively. Our study highlights the urgent need for large-scale measurement and reporting of physical activity and the use of standard tools that can allow for the regular assessment and screening of the PA prevalence to support evidence-informed policy and programs development at both national and regional levels.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: SAGE Open Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 20503121221118712

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: SAGE Open Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 20503121221118712