Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Hesitancy for receiving regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in UK healthcare workers: a cross-sectional analysis from the UK-REACH study.
Veli, Neyme; Martin, Christopher A; Woolf, Katherine; Nazareth, Joshua; Pan, Daniel; Al-Oraibi, Amani; Baggaley, Rebecca F; Bryant, Luke; Nellums, Laura B; Gray, Laura J; Khunti, Kamlesh; Pareek, Manish.
  • Veli N; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Martin CA; Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Woolf K; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Nazareth J; Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Pan D; University College London Medical School, London, UK.
  • Al-Oraibi A; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Baggaley RF; Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Bryant L; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Nellums LB; Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Gray LJ; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Khunti K; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Pareek M; Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 386, 2022 10 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2064797
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Regular vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 may be needed to maintain immunity in 'at-risk' populations, which include healthcare workers (HCWs). However, little is known about the proportion of HCWs who might be hesitant about receiving a hypothetical regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or the factors associated with this hesitancy.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional analysis of questionnaire data collected as part of UK-REACH, a nationwide, longitudinal cohort study of HCWs. The outcome measure was binary, either a participant indicated they would definitely accept regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination if recommended or they indicated some degree of hesitancy regarding acceptance (probably accept or less likely). We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with hesitancy for receiving regular vaccination.

RESULTS:

A total of 5454 HCWs were included in the analysed cohort, 23.5% of whom were hesitant about regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Black HCWs were more likely to be hesitant than White HCWs (aOR 2.60, 95%CI 1.80-3.72) as were those who reported a previous episode of COVID-19 (1.33, 1.13-1.57 [vs those who tested negative]). Those who received influenza vaccination in the previous two seasons were over five times less likely to report hesitancy for regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination than those not vaccinated against influenza in either season (0.18, 0.14-0.21). HCWs who trusted official sources of vaccine information (such as NHS or government adverts or websites) were less likely to report hesitancy for a regular vaccination programme. Those who had been exposed to information advocating against vaccination from friends and family were more likely to be hesitant.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, nearly a quarter of UK HCWs were hesitant about receiving a regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We have identified key factors associated with hesitancy for regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, which can be used to identify groups of HCWs at the highest risk of vaccine hesitancy and tailor interventions accordingly. Family and friends of HCWs may influence decisions about regular vaccination. This implies that working with HCWs and their social networks to allay concerns about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could improve uptake in a regular vaccination programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN11811602.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12916-022-02588-7

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12916-022-02588-7