Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Drive-by collection and self-fitting of ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring.
Mills, Mark T; Ritzmann, Sarah; Danson, Maisie; Payne, Gillian E; Warriner, David R.
  • Mills MT; Cardiology Registrar, and Academic Clinical Fellow, University of Sheffield Department of Cardiology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, DN2 5LT.
  • Ritzmann S; Chief Cardiac Physiologist Department of Cardiology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, DN2 5LT.
  • Danson M; Cardiac Physiologist Department of Cardiology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, DN2 5LT.
  • Payne GE; Consultant Cardiologist Department of Cardiology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, DN2 5LT.
  • Warriner DR; Consultant Cardiologist Department of Cardiology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, DN2 5LT.
Br J Cardiol ; 29(2): 12, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067105
ABSTRACT
Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) monitoring is a common cardiovascular investigation. Traditionally, this requires a face-to-face appointment. In order to reduce contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigated whether drive-by collection and self-fitting of the device by the patient represents an acceptable alternative. A prospective, observational study of consecutive patients requiring AECG monitoring over a period of one month at three hospitals was performed. Half underwent standard (face-to-face) fitting, and half attended a drive-by service to collect their monitor, fitting their device at home. Outcome measures were quality of the recordings (determined as good, acceptable or poor), and patient satisfaction. A total of 375 patients were included (192 face-to-face, 183 drive-by). Mean patient age was similar between the two groups. The quality of the AECG recordings was similar in both groups (52.6% good in face-to-face vs. 53.0% in drive-by; 34.9% acceptable in face-to-face vs. 32.2% in drive-by; 12.5% poor in face-to-face vs. 14.8% in drive-by; Chi-square statistic 0.55, p=0.76). Patient satisfaction rates were high, with all patients in both groups satisfied with the care they received. In conclusion, drive-by collection and self-fitting of AECG monitoring yields similar AECG quality to conventional face-to-face fitting, with high levels of patient satisfaction.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Br J Cardiol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Br J Cardiol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article