Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rehabilitation Professional and Patient Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Amin, Junaid; Ahmad, Basaruddin; Amin, Salman; Siddiqui, Ammar Ahmed; Alam, Mohammad Khursheed.
  • Amin J; School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
  • Ahmad B; School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
  • Amin S; College of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Siddiqui AA; College of Dentistry, Preventive Dental Sciences, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alam MK; Department of Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Multan, Pakistan.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 7366063, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2070621
ABSTRACT
Telerehabilitation offers an alternative healthcare delivery remotely in a patient's environment at a lower cost, better accessibility, and equivalent quality to the standard approach. Several studies had examined the effectiveness of telerehabilitation inpatients with musculoskeletal disorders, and although there is evidence that it is at least equally effective as the standard care, the patient and rehabilitation professional satisfaction with the delivery method is not conclusive. A systematic review was conducted to study the patients' and rehabilitation professionals' satisfaction with telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. A search for relevant studies on 29 April 2021 was carried out in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS). The search terms included "telerehabilitation," AND "satisfaction" AND "musculoskeletal disorders," "telehealth," "telemedicine," "patient experience," and "pain". Fifteen eligible studies with 12,341 patients were included in this systematic review. A report was included if it (a) assessed the satisfaction of patients or professionals or both as one of the outcomes of a telerehabilitation intervention, (b) included adults 18 years and above with musculoskeletal disorders, and (c) is an intervention study using a quantitative approach. The quality of studies was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist tool developed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Most of the studies reported that patients were satisfied with both telerehabilitation and face-to-face intervention. However, few studies reported that patients were more satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face of intervention. Patients in one study had preferred the incorporation of telerehabilitation and face-to-face sessions. Two of three studies had reported overall satisfaction with telerehabilitation by the professionals. Overall, there is evidence that patients and rehabilitation professional are satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face consultation.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Musculoskeletal Diseases / Telemedicine / Telerehabilitation Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2022

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Musculoskeletal Diseases / Telemedicine / Telerehabilitation Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2022