Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Regional Trends for the 2021 COVID-19 Independent Plastic Surgery Match Cycle.
Akhter, Haris M; Weis, Lauren; Huang, Cassie; Samson, Kaeli K; McCarthy, Philip; Hon, Heidi.
  • Akhter HM; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
  • Weis L; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
  • Huang C; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
  • Samson KK; Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
  • McCarthy P; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
  • Hon H; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29172, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2072196
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The coronavirus disease (COVID) created an abrupt change to virtual experiences and interviews for both the integrated and independent plastic surgery match cycle of 2021. Studies have shown that during the 2021 match cycle, integrated applicants were more likely to match at their home institution and region of medical school. These geographic and location trends for the 2021 match cycle have not been explored yet for the independent plastic surgery match.

METHODS:

Information for independent plastic surgery applicants that successfully matched was gathered using publicly available data for the 2019 and 2020 pre-COVID and 2021 COVID match cycles. Zip codes for applicant medical school, applicant residency program, and plastic surgery program were gathered to compare regional and distance outcomes between the pre-COVID and COVID match cycles.

RESULTS:

Data was collected on 182 applicants from 42 programs. There was no significant difference in the breakdown of gender percentages between the COVID match cycle (63.2% males) and the pre-COVID match cycles (72% males) (p=0.23). The COVID match cycle had 38.6% of applicants match at a plastics program within the same region as their residency, while the pre-COVID match cycles had 47.2% of applicants match the same region (p=0.28). These results continued to be nonsignificant when stratified by the regions of the west, south, midwest, and northeast (p=1.00). With regional matches with respect to medical school, the COVID match cycle had 33.3% of applicants match at a plastics program within the same region as their medical school, while the pre-COVID match cycles had 43.6% (p=0.20). These results continued to be nonsignificant when stratified by the four regions (p=1.00). When comparing the median distances between the COVID match cycle and the pre-COVID match cycle, no region of the United States showed a significant difference in travel distance to a plastics program with respect to medical school or residency (p=1.00).

CONCLUSION:

Transitions to virtual interviews and cancellation of away rotations during the COVID match cycle for the independent plastic surgery match did not significantly affect an applicant's ability to match outside of their region of previous medical school or residency. This may represent diminished program preference for applicants within the same region as their plastic residency.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cureus.29172

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cureus.29172