Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Practicing Maternal-Fetal Medicine Clinicians.
Guendelman, Sylvia; Krueger, Grace N; Cruz, Giovanna I; Trepman, Paula C; Suharwardy, Sanaa H.
  • Guendelman S; The Wallace Center for Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Krueger GN; The Wallace Center for Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Cruz GI; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Trepman PC; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Suharwardy SH; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Telemed J E Health ; 2022 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315047
ABSTRACT

Background:

Limited knowledge exists about the drivers of telehealth use among obstetricians during COVID-19 in the United States. We investigated the use of live video visits by Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) clinicians, the factors associated with use and interest in future use.

Methods:

We drew survey data from 373 clinicians on two

outcomes:

(1) use of any (vs. no) live video visits during COVID-19 and (2) among users, the extent of live video use. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions quantified the association between predisposing (demographic and practice setting characteristics) and enabling factors (prepandemic telehealth use, structural and perceived patient barriers) and each outcome.

Results:

During the pandemic, 88% reported any use, a jump from 29% prepandemic utilization. Users (vs. nonusers) were younger (p = 0.02); tended to provide comprehensive prenatal care (p = 0.01) and/or inpatient care (p = 0.02), practice in university settings (p = 0.01), engage in various telehealth modalities prepandemic (p ≤ 0.01), and to perceive challenges with technical (p < 0.01), reimbursement (p = 0.05), and patient barriers to internet or data plan access (p ≤ 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, only prepandemic communication through patient portal (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-11.12), perceived patient access barriers (aOR = 5.27; 95% CI = 1.95-14.23), and practice in multiple versus university settings (aOR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.06-0.56) remained significantly associated with use. Approximately 44% were high users. Prepandemic ultrasound use (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.17-3.16), perceived patient access barriers (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.12-3.06) and Midwest versus North practice location (aOR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.21-0.98) predicted high use. Among high users, 99% wanted to continue offering video visits.

Conclusions:

We found widespread use of live video obstetric care by MFM clinicians and continued interest in use postpandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2022.0346

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2022.0346