Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Deep learning of longitudinal chest X-ray and clinical variables predicts duration on ventilator and mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Duanmu, Hongyi; Ren, Thomas; Li, Haifang; Mehta, Neil; Singer, Adam J; Levsky, Jeffrey M; Lipton, Michael L; Duong, Tim Q.
  • Duanmu H; Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Ren T; Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Li H; Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Mehta N; Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Singer AJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
  • Levsky JM; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Lipton ML; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
  • Duong TQ; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. tim.duong@einsteinmed.org.
Biomed Eng Online ; 21(1): 77, 2022 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2079424
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To use deep learning of serial portable chest X-ray (pCXR) and clinical variables to predict mortality and duration on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study. Serial pCXR and serial clinical variables were analyzed for data from day 1, day 5, day 1-3, day 3-5, or day 1-5 on IMV (110 IMV survivors and 76 IMV non-survivors). The outcome variables were duration on IMV and mortality. With fivefold cross-validation, the performance of the proposed deep learning system was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and correlation analysis.

RESULTS:

Predictive models using 5-consecutive-day data outperformed those using 3-consecutive-day and 1-day data. Prediction using data closer to the outcome was generally better (i.e., day 5 data performed better than day 1 data, and day 3-5 data performed better than day 1-3 data). Prediction performance was generally better for the combined pCXR and non-imaging clinical data than either alone. The combined pCXR and non-imaging data of 5 consecutive days predicted mortality with an accuracy of 85 ± 3.5% (95% confidence interval (CI)) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.05 (95% CI) and predicted the duration needed to be on IMV to within 2.56 ± 0.21 (95% CI) days on the validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS:

Deep learning of longitudinal pCXR and clinical data have the potential to accurately predict mortality and duration on IMV in COVID-19 patients. Longitudinal pCXR could have prognostic value if these findings can be validated in a large, multi-institutional cohort.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration Disorders / Deep Learning / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Eng Online Journal subject: Biomedical Engineering Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12938-022-01045-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration Disorders / Deep Learning / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Biomed Eng Online Journal subject: Biomedical Engineering Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12938-022-01045-z