Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19.
Lippincott, Christopher K; Perry, Allison; Munk, Elizabeth; Maltas, Gina; Shah, Maunank.
  • Lippincott CK; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans St, CRB-II, 1M-10, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Perry A; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Munk E; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans St, CRB-II, 1M-10, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Maltas G; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans St, CRB-II, 1M-10, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Shah M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans St, CRB-II, 1M-10, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA. mshah28@jhmi.edu.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 800, 2022 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2089168
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT.

METHODS:

We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre-COVID and COVID (April 2020) periods.

RESULTS:

Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased in the COVID period (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p = 0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre-COVID and COVID periods (65% versus 68%, respectively, p = 0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70-98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55-64%], p < 0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs. 58%, p < 0.01) and COVID period (median 80% vs. 62%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

vDOT utilization increased during the COVID period and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tuberculosis / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12879-022-07787-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tuberculosis / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12879-022-07787-4