Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Effect of Nitazoxanide on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Abuelazm, Mohamed; Ghanem, Ahmed; Awad, Ahmed K; Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez; Labieb, Fatma; Katamesh, Basant E; Abdelazeem, Basel.
  • Abuelazm M; Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. Dr.mabuelazm@gmail.com.
  • Ghanem A; Cardiology Department, The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, CA, USA.
  • Awad AK; Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Farahat RA; Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
  • Labieb F; Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
  • Katamesh BE; Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  • Abdelazeem B; Department of Internal Medicine, McLaren Health Care, Flint, MI, USA.
Clin Drug Investig ; 42(12): 1031-1047, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2094845
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Nitazoxanide, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiparasitic agent, was reported to be effective in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The lack of effective and precise treatments for COVID-19 infection earlier in the pandemic forced us to depend on symptomatic, empirical, and supportive therapy, which overburdened intensive care units and exhausted hospital resources. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was  to assess the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide for COVID-19 treatment.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing relevant randomized controlled trials from six databases (MedRxiv, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL) until 17 May 2022 was conducted. Risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes was used and data with a 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID CRD42022334658.

RESULTS:

Six randomized controlled trials with 1412 patients were included in the analysis. Nitazoxanide was effective in accelerating viral clearance compared with placebo (RR 1.30 with 95% CI 1.08, 1.56, p = 0.006) and reducing oxygen requirements (RR 0.48 with 95% CI 0.39, 0.59, p = 0.00001), but we found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in improving clinical resolution (RR 1.01 with 95% CI 0.94, 1.08, p = 0.88), reducing the mortality rate (RR 0.88 with 95% CI 0.4, 1.91, p = 0.74), and intensive care unit admission (RR 0.69 with 95% CI 0.43, 1.13, p = 0.14). Moreover, nitazoxanide was as safe as placebo (RR 0.9 with 95% CI 0.72, 1.12, p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with placebo, nitazoxanide was effective in expediting viral clearance and decreasing oxygen requirements. However, there was no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo regarding clinical response, all-cause mortality, and intensive care unit admission. Therefore, more large-scale studies are still needed to ascertain the clinical applicability of nitazoxanide in COVID-19.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Clin Drug Investig Journal subject: Pharmacology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40261-022-01213-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Clin Drug Investig Journal subject: Pharmacology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40261-022-01213-y