Your browser doesn't support javascript.
English care home staff morale and preparedness during the COVID pandemic: A longitudinal analysis.
Brainard, Julii; Bunn, Diane; Watts, Laura; Killett, Anne; O'Brien, Sarah J; Lake, Iain R; Mumford, Suzanne; Lane, Kathleen.
  • Brainard J; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK. Electronic address: j.brainard@uea.ac.uk.
  • Bunn D; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
  • Watts L; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
  • Killett A; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
  • O'Brien SJ; School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK.
  • Lake IR; School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
  • Mumford S; Care UK Connaught House, Colchester Essex, UK.
  • Lane K; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Am J Infect Control ; 2022 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2094996
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Staff actions to prevent infection introduction and transmission in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) were key to reducing morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Implementing infection control measures (ICMs) requires training, adherence and complex decision making while trying to deliver high quality care. We surveyed LTCF staff in England about their preparedness and morale at 3 timepoints during the COVID-19 epidemic.

METHODS:

Online structured survey targeted at LTCF workers (any role) administered at 3 timepoints (November 2020-January 2021; August-November 2021; March-May 2022). Narrative summary of answers, narrative and statistical summary (proportionality with Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test) of possible differences in answers between waves.

RESULTS:

Across all 3 survey waves, 387 responses were received. Morale, attitudes towards working environment and perception about colleague collaboration were mostly positive at all survey points. Infection control training was perceived as adequate. Staff felt mostly positive emotions at work. The working environment remained challenging. Masks were the single form of PPE most consistently used; eye protection the least used. Mask-wearing was linked to poorer communication and resident discomfort as well as mild negative health impacts on many staff, such as dehydration and adverse skin reactions. Hand sanitizer caused skin irritation. CONCUSIONS Staff morale and working practices were generally good even though the working environment provided many new challenges that did not exist pre-pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article