Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review.
Chebil, Dhekra; Ben Hassine, Donia; Melki, Sarra; Nouira, Sarra; Kammoun Rebai, Wafa; Hannachi, Hajer; Merzougui, Latifa; Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed.
  • Chebil D; Infection Prevention Control Department, Ibn Al Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, Tunisia.
  • Ben Hassine D; Research Laboratory, LR19SP01, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Melki S; Faculty of medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Nouira S; Research Laboratory, LR19SP01, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Kammoun Rebai W; Information System Direction (DSI), Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Hannachi H; Research Laboratory, LR19SP01, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Merzougui L; Information System Direction (DSI), Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
  • Ben Abdelaziz A; Research Laboratory, LR19SP01, Sousse, Tunisia.
Libyan J Med ; 17(1): 2140473, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2097169
ABSTRACT
Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing ('social isolation', 'social distancing', 'quarantine') combining with 'epidemics'. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R0 and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R0 from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Libyan J Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 19932820.2022.2140473

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Libyan J Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 19932820.2022.2140473