Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Adherence to and enforcement of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for COVID-19 prevention in Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zambia: A mixed-methods analysis.
Solomon, Hiwote; Thea, Donald M; Galea, Sandro; Sabin, Lora L; Lucey, Daniel R; Hamer, Davidson H.
  • Solomon H; Doctor of Public Health Program, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Thea DM; Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Galea S; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Sabin LL; Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Lucey DR; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
  • Hamer DH; Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 2(9): e0000389, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2098671
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In the early parts of the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented worldwide, including in sub-Saharan Africa, to prevent and control SARS-CoV-2 transmission. This mixed-methods study examines adherence to and enforcement of NPIs implemented to curb COVID-19 in Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zambia, leading up to the 10,000th case of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in each country. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the relationship between levels and changes of NPIs over time and changes in COVID-19 cases and deaths.

METHODS:

This mixed-methods analysis utilized semi-structured interviews and a quantitative dataset constructed using multiple open data sources, including the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. To understand potential barriers and facilitators in implementing and enforcing NPIs qualitative data were collected from those involved in the COVID-19 response and analyzed using NVivo. Quantitative results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, plots, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey.

RESULTS:

Individual indicator scores varied with the COVID-19 response in all three countries. Nigeria had sustained levels of strict measures for containment and closure NPIs, while in Rwanda there was substantial variation in NPI score as it transitioned through the different case windows for the same measures. Zambia implemented moderate stringency throughout the pandemic using gathering restrictions and business/school closure measures but maintained low levels of strictness for other containment and closure measures. Rwanda had far more consistent and stringent measures compared to Nigeria and Zambia. Rwanda's success in implementing COVID-related measures was partly due to strong enforcement and having a population that generally follow the recommendations of their government.

CONCLUSION:

Various forces either facilitated or hindered adherence and compliance to COVID-19 control measures. The lessons learned and recommendations gleaned through interviews with experts involved in the COVID-19 pandemic and quantitative analysis of NPI implementation can be applied to future outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics. Recommendations include engaging communities, using a risk-based approach to implement containment and closure NPIs, and providing social and economic support to citizens during periods of lockdowns and other measures that interrupt the ability to make a living.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: PLOS Glob Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pgph.0000389

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: PLOS Glob Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pgph.0000389