Your browser doesn't support javascript.
SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for screening of healthcare workers; experience with over 48,000 combined antigen tests and RT-PCR tests.
Piek, A; Knoester, M; Gard, L; Lokate, M; Niesters, H G M; van Leer-Buter, C L.
  • Piek A; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.piek@umcg.nl.
  • Knoester M; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Gard L; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Lokate M; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Niesters HGM; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • van Leer-Buter CL; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Division of Clinical Virology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Clin Virol ; 158: 105326, 2022 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244237
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To prevent spread to patients and co-workers, health care workers (HCWs) infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) should quickly be identified. Although real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard, this test takes several hours, during which a HCW is unable to work. Antigen (Ag) tests may be an efficacious means of screening HCWs since they are easy to perform and provide fast results.

METHODS:

In this study, 48,010 paired results of Ag-testing and RT-PCR, performed on HCWs between January 2021 and April 2022, were evaluated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-tests in diagnosing potentially infectious individuals. This analysis was performed with cycling threshold values (Ct-values) ≤30 and ≤25 as cut-offs.

RESULTS:

Respectively 3.1% (n = 1507) and 0.3% (n = 140) of Ag-tests were positive or indeterminate, and thus indicative for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 2479 (5.2%) RT-PCRs were positive, of which 1529 (61.7%) had a Ct-value ≤25 and 402 (16.2%) a Ct-value between 26 and 30. At Ct-value ≤30 as a cut-off, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Ag-tests were 79.0%, 99.8%, 93.8% and 99.1%, respectively. At Ct-value ≤25, sensitivity further improved to 92.0%, by which the NPV increased to 99.7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

To prevent transmission from HCWs to patients and co-workers, while maintaining workforce capacity, Ag-tests are a valuable addition to RT-PCR tests, as they have a quick turnaround time and excellent sensitivity for identifying individuals with high potential for transmission.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article