Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Needs to address clinicians' moral distress in treating unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.
Klitzman, Robert.
  • Klitzman R; Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Mail Unit #15, New York, NY, 10032, USA. rlk2@cumc.columbia.edu.
BMC Med Ethics ; 23(1): 110, 2022 11 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2115724
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Moral dilemmas have arisen concerning whether physicians and other providers should treat patients who have declined COVID vaccination and are now sick with this disease. Several ethicists have argued that clinicians have obligations to treat such patients, yet providing care to these patients has distressed clinicians, who have at times declined to do so. Critical questions thus emerge regarding how best to proceed. MAIN BODY Providers face moral tensions whether to place the benefits to an unvaccinated patient over their duties to protect themselves and their families, staff and other patients, and goals of working collaboratively with patients. Clinicians' duties to treat such patients arguably outweigh claims otherwise, but these obligations are creating moral conflict and distress for providers. Moral distress has been associated with burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder, and interpersonal and work difficulties. Given ongoing vaccine refusals, these problems are unlikely to disappear in the foreseeable future. Society has obligations to address this moral distress due to principles of reciprocity, and implicit social contracts, as part of which physicians risk their lives in caring for patients for the good of society as a whole. Responses are thus urgently needed at several levels by hospitals, medical schools, professional societies, governments, media, providers and patients. Medical training on professionalism should address these stresses, probing why doctors have duties to treat these patients, but also how moral conflicts can ensue, and how best to address these tensions. Governments and institutions should thus alter relevant policies and devote more resources to addressing clinicians' psychological strains. Institutions should also improve organizational culture. Public health organizations and the media described clinicians, earlier in the pandemic, as heroes, committed to treating COVID patients. This narrative should now be changed to highlight the strains that unvaccinated patients cause-endangering hospital staff and others.

CONCLUSIONS:

Unvaccinated COVID patients should receive care, but multi-level strategies, involving enhanced policies, education and practice are vital to alleviate ensuing moral distress, and thus aid these clinicians and their patients. Ethical arguments that providers must treat these patients have not considered these obligations' effects on clinicians, but should do so.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Burnout, Professional / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Ethics Journal subject: Ethics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12910-022-00859-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Burnout, Professional / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Ethics Journal subject: Ethics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12910-022-00859-9