Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Adverse events following administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi Arabia.
Alqahtani, Saleh; Jokhdar, Hani; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A; Al-Otaibi, Salah; Assiri, Abdullah; Almudarra, Sami; Alabdulkareem, Khaled; Haji, Alhan.
  • Alqahtani S; Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Jokhdar H; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Al-Tawfiq JA; Deputyship of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Al-Otaibi S; Specialty Internal Medicine and Quality Patient Safety Department, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Assiri A; Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Almudarra S; Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Alabdulkareem K; Department of Anesthesia, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Haji A; Assisting Deputyship for Preventive Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 19551, 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119159
ABSTRACT
Previous studies investigated the frequency of different adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines. However, this study compares these adverse events between the two main COVID-19 vaccines used in Saudi Arabia (Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca) using telemedicine technology. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 958 individuals, 7 days after receiving either Pfizer-BioNTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines during June 2021. Immediate adverse events were reported by 1.04% and 2.09% for Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines, respectively, with no serious events. Recipients of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had a higher percentage of local adverse events (24.8% versus 9.8% in AstraZeneca vaccine). The most common reported systemic adverse events in both vaccines respectively were general fatigue (23.1% and 25.1%), fever (18.5% and 27.2%), myalgia (20.6% and 20.3%), and headache (15.2% and 17.2%). No significant difference was recorded between both vaccines regarding overall systemic adverse events; however, they were more frequent following the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine compared to Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while the reverse was observed for the second dose. Adverse events were more frequent in females and younger age groups for both vaccines. Most of systemic and local adverse events were mild in nature. Further cohort studies are recommended to investigate the long-term adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-23471-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-23471-8