Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Distribution characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in false-positive results detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay.
Lei, Yan; Lu, Xiaolan; Mou, Daiyong; Du, Qin; Wang, Guangrong; Wang, Qiang.
  • Lei Y; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
  • Lu X; Department of Laboratory Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College; Translational Medicine Research Center, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
  • Mou D; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
  • Du Q; Department of Laboratory Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College; Translational Medicine Research Center, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
  • Wang G; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Open Life Sci ; 17(1): 1487-1496, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2123336
ABSTRACT
There have been several false-positive results in the antibody detection of COVID-19. This study aimed to analyze the distribution characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in false-positive results using chemiluminescent immunoassay. The characteristics of false-positive results in SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG tests were analyzed. The false-positive proportion of single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results was 95.88%, which was higher than those of single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results (71.05%; p < 0.001) and SARS-CoV-2 IgM- and IgG-positive results (39.39%; p < 0.001). The S/CO ratios of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in false-positive results ranged from 1.0 to 50.0. The false-positive probability of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in the ratios of specimen signals to the cutoff value (S/CO) range (1.0-3.0) was 95.06% (77/81), and the probability of false-positive results of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the S/CO range (1.0-2.0) was 85.71% (24/28). Dynamic monitoring showed that the S/CO values of IgM in false-positive results decreased or remained unchanged, whereas the S/CO values of IgG in false-positive results decreased. The possibility of false-positive single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive and single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results was high. As the value of S/CO ratios decreased, the probability of false-positives consequently increased, especially among the single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: Open Life Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Biol-2022-0512

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: Open Life Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Biol-2022-0512