Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Assessment of Virtual Peer Learning by Peer Feedback: A Pilot Project.
Uthraraj, Nachappa Sivanesan; Charles, Nina Mary; Garcia, Sean M; Maatough, Annis; Anazor, Fitzgerald; Krishnamurthy, Sumathi; Sriraam, Laya Manasa; Chettiakkapalayam Venkatachalam, Kannaki; Relwani, Jai.
  • Uthraraj NS; Trauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
  • Charles NM; Medical and Surgical Research, Thamarai Health Care, Coimbatore, IND.
  • Garcia SM; Critical Care, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, GBR.
  • Maatough A; Trauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
  • Anazor F; Trauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
  • Krishnamurthy S; Trauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
  • Sriraam LM; General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (UCMS) and Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
  • Chettiakkapalayam Venkatachalam K; Otolaryngology, Kanchi Kamakoti Childs Trust Hospital, Chennai, IND.
  • Relwani J; Reproductive Medicine, The Fertility Center, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital (KMCH), Coimbatore, IND.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30596, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2124084
ABSTRACT
Introduction Virtual learning has become the preferred modality for health education during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Peer learning is gaining a lot of significance lately and has been successfully tested in various settings. We combined virtual delivery of health education with peer-assisted learning and evaluated the effectiveness using peer-generated feedback and tested the effectiveness of the model for different cohorts. Methods We performed this study as part of a formal educational course on Health Professions Education. The educators were volunteers from different informal multi-disciplinary groups, working in varied healthcare settings, globally. This involved eight teaching sessions which were delivered virtually and the feedback was recorded as responses to six items (questions), which the learners graded on the Likert scale. The average for each item and the larger domains was then calculated and analyzed.  Results The feedback was provided by all the participants (53/53). In the feedback received item-wise, the best average rating was for legibility of the slides (4.8). The least rating was for adequate checking and assessment of prior knowledge (4.2). In terms of the broader domains, the best feedback was for the teaching material (4.6) and the lowest was for the planning of the sessions (4.4). Overall, the ratings for the domains and the items were above 3 on a scale of 1-5. Conclusions Virtual delivery of healthcare education, facilitated by peer-assisted learning, is an effective model for health education when delivered for a small group, as evidenced by the overall peer feedback. This model can be tested for larger cohorts in the future.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article