Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy and safety of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibodies in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis.
Xi, An-Ran; Luo, Yi-Jun; Guan, Jin-Tao; Wang, Wei-Jie; Xu, Zheng-Hao.
  • Xi AR; Laboratory of Rheumatology and Institute of TCM Clinical Basic Medicine, College of Basic Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Binwen Road 548, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
  • Luo YJ; Laboratory of Rheumatology and Institute of TCM Clinical Basic Medicine, College of Basic Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Binwen Road 548, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
  • Guan JT; First People's Hospital of Taizhou, Taizhou, 318020, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wang WJ; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
  • Xu ZH; Laboratory of Rheumatology and Institute of TCM Clinical Basic Medicine, College of Basic Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Binwen Road 548, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China. xuzhenghao@zcmu.edu.cn.
Inflammopharmacology ; 2022 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287136
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibodies in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases until July 27, 2022. Both randomized control trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included and analyzed separately. The outcomes included mortality, incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), ventilation improvement rate (need oxygen therapy to without oxygen therapy), secondary infection, and adverse events (AEs). The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by a random-effects meta-analysis model.

RESULTS:

Five RCTs and 2 cohort studies with 1726 COVID-19 patients were recruited (n = 866 in the GM-CSF antibody group and n = 891 in the control group). GM-CSF antibodies treatment reduced the incidence of IMV, which was supported by two cohort studies (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74) and three RCTs (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41, 0.94). GM-CSF antibodies resulted in slight but not significant reductions in mortality (based on two cohort studies and five RCTs) and ventilation improvement (based on one cohort study and two RCTs). The sensitive analysis further showed the results of mortality and ventilation improvement rate became statistically significant when one included study was removed. Besides, GM-CSF antibodies did not increase the risks of the second infection (based on one cohort study and five RCTs) and AEs (based on five RCTs).

CONCLUSION:

GM-CSF antibody treatments may be an efficacious and well-tolerant way for the treatment of COVID-19. Further clinical evidence is still warranted.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Language: English Journal subject: Pharmacology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10787-022-01105-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Language: English Journal subject: Pharmacology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10787-022-01105-9