Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Additional consensus recommendations for conducting complex innovative trials of oncology agents: a post-pandemic perspective.
Blagden, Sarah P; Yu, Ly-Mee; Ellis, Stephanie; Hughes, Helen; Shaaban, Abeer; Fennelly-Barnwell, Jonathan; Lythgoe, Mark P; Cooper, Alison M; Maignen, Francois M; Buckland, Sean W; Kearns, Pamela R; Brown, Louise C.
  • Blagden SP; Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sarah.blagden@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
  • Yu LM; Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Ellis S; London Hampstead Research Ethics Committee, Health Research Authority, Elephant and Castle, London, UK.
  • Hughes H; Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Shaaban A; Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Fennelly-Barnwell J; London Hampstead Research Ethics Committee, Health Research Authority, Elephant and Castle, London, UK.
  • Lythgoe MP; Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, UK.
  • Cooper AM; The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, London, UK.
  • Maignen FM; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
  • Buckland SW; Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
  • Kearns PR; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Brown LC; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, UK.
Br J Cancer ; 2022 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252342
ABSTRACT
In our 2020 consensus paper, we devised ten recommendations for conducting Complex Innovative Design (CID) trials to evaluate cancer drugs. Within weeks of its publication, the UK was hit by the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Large CID trials were prioritised to compare the efficacy of new and repurposed COVID-19 treatments and inform regulatory decisions. The unusual circumstances of the pandemic meant studies such as RECOVERY were opened almost immediately and recruited record numbers of participants. However, trial teams were required to make concessions and adaptations to these studies to ensure recruitment was rapid and broad. As these are relevant to cancer trials that enrol patients with similar risk factors, we have added three new recommendations to our original ten employing pragmatism such as using focused information sheets and collection of only the most relevant data; minimising negative environmental impacts with paperless systems; and using direct-to-patient communication methods to improve uptake. These recommendations can be applied to all oncology CID trials to improve their inclusivity, uptake and efficiency. Above all, the success of CID studies during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores their efficacy as tools for rapid treatment evaluation.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41416-022-02051-7

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41416-022-02051-7