Estimated glomerular filtration rates are higher when creatinine-based equations are compared with a cystatin C-based equation in coronavirus disease 2019.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are based on analyses of creatinine and cystatin C, respectively. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often have acute kidney injury (AKI) and are at increased risk of drug-induced kidney injury. The aim of this study was to compare creatinine-based eGFR equations to cystatin C-based eGFR in ICU patients with COVID-19. METHODS: After informed consent, we included 370 adult ICU patients with COVID-19. Creatinine and cystatin C were analyzed at admission to the ICU as part of the routine care. Creatinine-based eGFR (ml/min) was calculated using the following equations, developed in chronological order; the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G), Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)1999, MDRD 2006, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Lund-Malmö revised (LMR) equations, which were compared with eGFR calculated using the cystatin C-based Caucasian Asian Pediatric Adult (CAPA) equation. RESULTS: The median eGFR when determined by C-G was 99 ml/min and interquartile range (IQR 67 ml/min). Corresponding estimations for MDRD1999 were 90 ml/min (IQR 54); MDRD2006 85 ml/min (IQR 51); CKD-EPI 91 ml/min (IQR 47); and for LMR 83 ml/min (IQR 41). eGFR was calculated using cystatin C and the CAPA equation value was 70 ml/min (IQR 38). All differences between creatinine-based eGFR versus cystatin C-based eGFR were significant (p < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of GFR based on various analyses of creatinine are higher when compared with a cystatin C-based equation. The C-G equation had the worst performance and should not be used in combination with modern creatinine analysis methods for determination of drug dosage in COVID-19 patients.