Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The kindness COVID-19 toolkit: a mixed-methods evaluation of a programme designed by doctors in training for doctors in training.
Ward, Madeleine C; Crinall, Karen; McDonald, Rebecca; Crinall, William; Aridas, James; Leung, Cheryl; Quittner, Danielle; Hodges, Ryan J; Rolnik, Daniel L.
  • Ward MC; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia madeleine.ward@monash.edu.
  • Crinall K; Women's & Newborn, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • McDonald R; Crinall Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Crinall W; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Aridas J; Women's & Newborn, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Leung C; Crinall Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Quittner D; Women's & Newborn, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hodges RJ; The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rolnik DL; Women's & Newborn, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e060575, 2022 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2137705
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The impact of a coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-specific professional development programme on the well-being of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) doctors in training (DiT) working during the pandemic.

DESIGN:

A mixed-method evaluation of a single group pre-post test design study.

SETTING:

Melbourne, Australia between September 2020 and April 2021.

PARTICIPANTS:

55 O&G DiT working across four healthcare sites of a major tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia, were included in the programme.

INTERVENTIONS:

The delivery of a codesigned peer-to-peer programme, which identified and addressed the well-being goals of O&G DiT. Seven interactive workshops were run alongside the implementation of a number of participant-led wellness initiatives. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Repeated-measures analysis of WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) and Copenhagen Burnout Innovatory (CBI) scores across three time points during the programme. Multilevel generalised linear mixed-effects models with random intercept were fit to the data, both in the entire population (intention-to-treat) and restricted to those who attended the workshop ('per-protocol' analysis). Participatory experiences and programme learning were captured using the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique, which included inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

We demonstrated an overall 31.9% improvement in well-being scores (p=0.006). The MSC evaluation captured a shift in workplace culture as a result of the programme, with improvement across the domains of connection, caring, communication, confidence and cooperation.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have successfully used a mixed-method approach to contextualise a productive programme to improve the well-being of COVID-19 front-line healthcare workers.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / COVID-19 / Medicine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-060575

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / COVID-19 / Medicine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-060575