Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Midwifery centers as enabled environments for midwifery: A quasi experimental design assessing women's birth experiences in three models of care in Bangladesh, before and during covid.
Stevens, Jennifer Rebecca; Sabin, Lora L; Onyango, Monica A; Sarker, Malabika; Declercq, Eugene.
  • Stevens JR; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Sabin LL; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Onyango MA; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Sarker M; James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Declercq E; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0278336, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2140702
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The midwifery model of care is a human rights-based approach (HRBA) that is unique and appropriate for the majority of healthy pregnant women, yet full expression may be limited within the medical model. Midwifery centers are facilities designed specifically to enable the practice of midwifery. In high resource countries, they have been shown to be cost effective, evidence-based, avoid over medicalization, and provide safe, efficient and satisfying care.

METHODS:

A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact of three models of care on women's experiences of respect, and trust in maternity care provision, both before and during the pandemic in Bangladesh, as well as their fear and knowledge around COVID-19, during the pandemic. The models were "fully enabled midwifery" ("FEM") in freestanding midwifery centers; "midwifery and medicine" ("MAM") in medical facilities with midwives working alongside nurses and doctors; and "no midwifery" ("NoM") in medical facilities without midwives. Phone survey data were collected and analyzed from all women (n = 1,191) who delivered from Jan 2020-June 2020 at seven health care facilities in Bangladesh. Comparison of means, ANOVA, post hoc Tukey, and effect size were used to explore the differences in outcomes across time periods.

FINDINGS:

Pre-pandemic, women served by the FEM model reported significantly higher rates of trust and respect (p<0·001) compared to the NoM model, and significantly higher rates of trust (p<0·001) compared to MAM. During the pandemic, in the FEM model, the experiences of respect and trust did not change significantly from the pre-pandemic rates, and were significantly higher than both the MAM and NoM models (p < 0·001). Additionally, during the pandemic, women served by the FEM model had the lowest experience of COVID fear (p<0·001).

INTERPRETATION:

Fully enabled midwifery in midwifery centers had a significantly positive effect on woman's experience of respect and trust in care compared to the other models, even in the context of a pandemic.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Maternal Health Services / Midwifery Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0278336

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Maternal Health Services / Midwifery Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0278336