Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Food Security of UK Adults Aged 20-65 Years (COVID-19 Food Security and Dietary Assessment Study).
Thomas, Michelle; Eveleigh, Elizabeth; Vural, Zeynep; Rose, Peter; Avery, Amanda; Coneyworth, Lisa; Welham, Simon.
  • Thomas M; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Eveleigh E; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Vural Z; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Rose P; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Avery A; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Coneyworth L; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
  • Welham S; Nutrition and Dietetics, Division of Food Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
Nutrients ; 14(23)2022 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2143418
ABSTRACT
The first UK lockdown greatly impacted the food security status of UK adults. This study set out to establish if food procurement was adapted differently for different income groups and if this impacted dietary intakes disproportionately. Adults (n = 515) aged 20-65 years participated in an online survey with 56 completing a 3-4 day diet diary. Food availability was a significant factor in the experience of food insecurity. Similar proportions of food secure and food insecure adapted food spend during lockdown, spending similar amounts. Food insecure (n = 85, 18.3%) had a 10.5% lower income and the money spent on food required a greater proportion of income. Access to food was the biggest driver of food insecurity but monetary constraint was a factor for the lowest income group. The relative risk of food insecurity increased by 0.07-fold for every 1% increase in the proportion of income spent on food above 10%. Micronutrient intakes were low compared to the reference nutrient intake (RNI) for most females, with riboflavin being 36% lower in food insecure groups (p = 0.03), whilst vitamin B12 was 56% lower (p = 0.057) and iodine 53.6% lower (p = 0.257) these were not significant. Coping strategies adopted by food insecure groups included altering the quantity and variety of fruit and vegetables which may have contributed to the differences in micronutrients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Supply / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Nu14235078

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Supply / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Nu14235078