Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Identifying the sectors involved in the European public health emergency preparedness and response: a systematic review.
Kengne Kamga, L S; Voordouw, A C G; de Vries, M C; Belfroid, E; Koopmans, M; Timen, A.
  • Kengne Kamga LS; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands sandra.kengne.kamga.mobou@rivm.nl.
  • Voordouw ACG; Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Vries MC; Center for Infectious Disease Research, Diagnostics and Laboratory Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Belfroid E; Center for Infectious Disease Research, Diagnostics and Laboratory Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Koopmans M; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Timen A; Department of Virology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e062624, 2022 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2152991
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A systematic review was conducted with the aims of identifying sectors mentioned in the public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR) literature and mapping the involvement of those sectors in the seven PHEPR cycle domains.

SETTING:

A detailed search strategy was conducted in Embase and Scopus, covering the period between 1 January 2005 and 1 January 2020.

METHODS:

Published articles focusing on preparedness for and/or response to public health emergencies of multiple origins on the European continent were included. The frequency with which predetermined sectors were mentioned when describing collaboration during the preparedness and response cycle was determined.

RESULTS:

The results show that description of the involvement of sectors in PHEPR in general and collaboration during PHEPR is predominantly confined to a limited number of sectors, namely 'Governmental institutions', 'Human health industry', 'Experts' and 'Civil Society'. Description is also limited to only three domains of the PHEPR cycle, namely 'Risk and crisis management', 'Pre-event preparations and governance' and 'Surveillance'.

CONCLUSIONS:

Optimal preparedness and response require predefined collaboration with a broader scope of partners than currently seems to be the case based on this literature review. We recommend considering these outcomes when planning multisectoral collaboration during preparedness and response, as well as the need to further operationalise the term 'multisectoral collaboration' during PHEPRs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO with registration number 176 331.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Civil Defense Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062624

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Civil Defense Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062624