Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Psychological stress and coping strategies among frontline healthcare workers supporting patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective study and literature review.
Ding, Xingyu; Jian, Zihong; Xu, Yiming; Lin, Zibei; Chen, Ziyang; Zhang, Yixian; Huang, Huayao; Chen, Ronghua; Xia, Pincang; Zhang, Wei; Du, Houwei.
  • Ding X; The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Jian Z; Department of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Xu Y; The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Lin Z; The First Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Chen Z; The Second Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
  • Huang H; Department of Rehabilitation, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
  • Chen R; Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
  • Xia P; Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang W; Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, China.
  • Du H; Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, China.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 16: 17534666221130215, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2153467
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak might have a psychological impact on frontline healthcare workers. However, the effectiveness of coping strategies was less reported.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to investigate the sources of stress and coping strategies among frontline healthcare workers fighting against COVID-19. We also performed a literature review regarding the effects of coping methods on psychological health in this population.

METHODS:

We included frontline healthcare workers who completed an online survey using self-made psychological stress questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. We evaluated the association between potential factors and high-stressed status using a logistic regression model. We performed the principal component analysis with varimax rotation for factor analysis. We also performed a systematic review of published randomized controlled studies that reported the effects of coping methods on psychological health in COVID-19 healthcare workers.

RESULTS:

We included 107 [32 (29-36) years] respondents in the final analysis, with a response rate of 80.5%. A total of 41 (38.3%) respondents were high-stressed. Compared with the low-stressed respondents, those with high-stress were less likely to be male (46.3% versus 72.7%, p = 0.006), nurses (36.6% versus 80.3%, p < 0.001), and more likely to have higher professional titles (p = 0.008). The sources of high-stress in frontline healthcare workers were categorized into 'work factor', 'personal factor', and 'role factor'. A narrative synthesis of the randomized controlled studies revealed that most of the coping methods could improve the psychological stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that some frontline healthcare workers experienced psychological stress during the early pandemic. Effective coping strategies are required to help relieve the stress in this population.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis Journal subject: Pulmonary Disease (Specialty) / Therapeutics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17534666221130215

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis Journal subject: Pulmonary Disease (Specialty) / Therapeutics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17534666221130215