Augmented reality for stroke rehabilitation during COVID-19.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lack of the rehabilitation professionals is a global issue and it is becoming more serious during COVID-19. An Augmented Reality Rehabilitation System (AR Rehab) was developed for virtual training delivery. The virtual training was integrated into the participants' usual care to reduce the human trainers' effort so that the manpower scarcity can be eased. This also resulted in the reduction of the contact rate in pandemics. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of the AR Rehab-based virtual training when integrated into the usual care in a real-world pandemic setting, by answering questions of whether the integrated trials can help fulfill the training goal and whether the trials can be delivered when resources are limited because of COVID-19. METHODS: Chronic stroke participants were randomly assigned to either a centre-based group (AR-Centre) or a home-based group (AR-Home) for a trial consisting of 20 sessions delivered in a human-machine integrated intervention. The trial of the AR-Centre was human training intensive with 3/4 of each session delivered by human trainers (PTs/OTs/Assistants) and 1/4 delivered by the virtual trainer (AR Rehab). The trial of the AR-Home was virtual training intensive with 1/4 and 3/4 of each session delivered by human and virtual trainers, respectively. Functional assessments including Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Barthel Index (BI) of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Physical Component Summary (SF-12v2 PCS) and Mental Component Summary (SF-12v2 MCS) of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2), were conducted before and after the intervention. User experience (UX) using questionnaires were collected after the intervention. Time and human resources required to deliver the human and virtual training, respectively, and the proportion of participants with clinical significant improvement were also used as supplementary measures. RESULTS: There were 129 patients from 10 rehabilitation centres enrolled in the integrated program with 39 of them were selected for investigation. Significant functional improvement in FMA-UE (AR-Centre p = 0.0022, AR-Home p = 0.0043), FMA-LE (AR-Centre p = 0.0007, AR-Home p = 0.0052), SF-12v2 PCS (AR-Centre p = 0.027, AR-Home p = 0.036) were observed in both groups. Significant improvement in balance ability (BBS p = 0.0438), and mental components (SF-12v2 MCS p = 0.017) were found in AR-Centre group, while activities of daily living (BI p = 0.0007) was found in AR-Home group. Contact rate was reduced by 30.75-72.30% within AR-All, 0.00-60.00% within AR-Centre, and 75.00-90.00% within AR-Home. CONCLUSION: The human-machine integrated mode was effective and efficient to reduce the human rehabilitation professionals' effort while fulfilling the training goals. It eased the scarcity of manpower and reduced the contact rate during the pandemics.