Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and design of a diagnostic report to support communication in dementia: Co-creation with patients and care partners.
van Gils, Aniek M; Visser, Leonie N C; Hendriksen, Heleen M A; Georges, Jean; van der Flier, Wiesje M; Rhodius-Meester, Hanneke F M.
  • van Gils AM; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  • Visser LNC; Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  • Hendriksen HMA; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  • Georges J; Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  • van der Flier WM; Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society Division of Clinical Geriatrics Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
  • Rhodius-Meester HFM; Department of Medical Psychology Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam UMC location AMC Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst) ; 14(1): e12333, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2172846
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Clear communication of diagnostic test results and dementia diagnosis is challenging yet important to empower patients and care partners. A personalized diagnostic report could support the communication of dementia diagnostics and aid patients' understanding of diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to design a diagnostic report in co-creation with patients and care partners.

Methods:

We used a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys with focus groups in iteration. Phase 1 consisted of an international survey assessing needs among patients (n = 50) and care partners (n = 46), and phase 2 consisted of focus group meetings (n = 3) to co-create the content and to hands-on co-design the layout of the diagnostic report with patients (n = 7) and care partners (n = 7). Phase 3 validated results from phase 2 in a survey among patients (n = 28) and care partners (n = 12), and phase 4 comprised final feedback by dementia (care) experts (n = 5). Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative results and directed content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data.

Results:

Most patients (39/50, 78%) and care partners (38/46, 83%) positively valued a diagnostic report to summarize test results. The report should be brief, straightforward, and comprise results of the diagnostic tests, including brain imaging and information on future expectations. Despite a clear preference for visual display of test results, several visualization options were deemed best and were equally comprehended.

Discussion:

In this study, we developed a prototype of a personalized patient report through an iterative design process and learned that co-creation is highly valuable to meet the specific needs of end-users.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article