Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Modernizing Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in the ICU in the COVID Era: Ensemble Super-Learning and Explainable AI
Value in Health ; 25(12 Supplement):S353, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2181162
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPrI) are areas of injury to the skin and/or underlying tissues. Risk stratification is essential for guiding prevention in the ICU, but current risk assessment tools require labor-intensive input. This motivates a tactical, parsimonious, and automatic risk profiling algorithm, that can be based on readily available clinical measures (e.g., COVID status, race, Medicare/Medicaid status). Additionally, International Pressure Injury Prevention guidelines call for the development of machine learning-based risk assessment algorithms that are clinician-interpretable and context-informed. Method(s) Adult patients admitted to one of two ICUs between April 2020, and April 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Discrete and ensemble super-learning models, adjusting for class imbalance, were created from a rich library of candidate base learners. For explainability, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) global and local values were derived to help explain variable average marginal contributions (across all permutations) to the model. An iteration of clinical expert review was performed with the SHAP values, and simulations of patient profiles and results were used to reformat and re-weight predictor variables. All analysis was run in open Python (version 3.7), and code/results will be made available via a GitHub page. Result(s) The final sample consisted of 1,911 patients (removing 9 with missing pressure injury status). Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (defined as stage 2, or worse) occurred in 18.5% of the sample (n=354). We achieved the best overall performance on the testing data with a stacked ensemble using three base models random forest (rf), gradient boosted machine (gbm), and neural network (NN) (Performance on 20% holdout Accuracy 81%;AUC 0.77;AUCPR 0.53). Conclusion(s) Prediction engineering should be done in collaboration with clinical experts to optimize tactical implementation to both optimize performance, with minimal interruption to workflow. XAI enhanced adoption of the experts' advice based on the selected model features. Copyright © 2022
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Value in Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Value in Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article