To open or not to open: the moderating effects of human mobility on the relationship between vaccination and COVID-19 transmission.

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 vaccination is being used to control SARS-CoV-2 transmission globally, and many countries have relaxed some non-pharmaceutical interventions. It is unclear whether relaxing human mobility restrictions is proper and increases transmission risk. To fill this knowledge gap, we aim to examine if human mobility impairs the role of vaccination on COVID-19 transmission. We apply dynamic panel data models with three lag levels (i.e. 0 day, 7 days, and 14 days) to investigate the relationship between vaccination and COVID-19 transmission and the moderating effects of different kinds of human mobility. Our results show a negative relationship between the percentage of the vaccinated population and daily new COVID-19 cases after controlling for human mobility. We also observe that when people are only vaccinated with one dose, increased human mobility in retail and recreation, grocery and pharmacy, parks, transit stations, and workplaces could impair the role of vaccination on COVID-19 transmission, although their moderating effects appear at different lag levels. However, there are no moderating effects of human mobility in transit stations and workplaces at all lag levels when people are fully vaccinated. This finding does not mean that governments may relax restrictions in these two areas since mobility in transit stations and workplaces could affect COVID-19 transmission by themselves directly. Therefore, we recommend that governments still insist on implementing human mobility control measures from the perspective of transmission risk.