Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Concerns about and stimuli of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among diverse occupational groups in metropolitan areas of China: a cross-sectional study.
Xie, Zhilan; Tan, Yinliang; Yan, Yuge; Gu, Xiaoqing; Chen, Haiying; Huang, Qian; Wang, Zhaoxin; Gu, Jie; Huang, Jiaoling.
  • Xie Z; School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Tan Y; School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Yan Y; School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Gu X; Xidu Community Health Service Center of Fengxian District, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen H; Xidu Community Health Service Center of Fengxian District, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang Q; Weifang Community Health Service Center of Pudong New District, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Z; School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Gu J; Department of General Practition, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang J; International Medical Center, Zhong Shan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e062032, 2022 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2193760
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In this study, we aimed to identify concerns and stimuli regarding COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and to compare the findings by occupation.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional study of individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 between 1 April and 30 June 2021 in four metropolitan areas of China. A total of 20 863 participants completed questionnaires, 20 767 of which were eligible for analysis. We used ordered logistic regression to assess the association of vaccination concerns and stimuli with vaccination hesitancy according to occupation.

RESULTS:

Farmers were mainly concerned about the quality of vaccines (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.18, 95% CI (CI) 1.83 to 5.54). Among civil servants, media publicity reduced hesitancy (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.92). Among medical staff, concerns about a short duration of protective effects increased hesitancy (aOR 8.31, 95% CI 2.03 to 33.99). For most occupations, concerns about side effects, poor protective effects and health status increased hesitancy. In contrast, protecting oneself and protecting others acted as a stimulus to decrease hesitancy. Interestingly, 'people around me have been vaccinated' was associated with higher vaccination hesitancy among farmers (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.00).

CONCLUSION:

The association of vaccination concerns and stimuli with vaccination hesitancy varied by occupation. The characteristics and concerns of specific target audiences should be considered when designing informational campaigns to promote vaccination against COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062032

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062032