Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Real-world assessment of the clinical performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test.
Pighi, Laura; Henry, Brandon M; De Nitto, Simone; Gianfilippi, Gianluca; Salvagno, Gian Luca; Lippi, Giuseppe.
  • Pighi L; Section of Clinical Biochemistry and School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Henry BM; Service of Laboratory Medicine, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
  • De Nitto S; Medical Direction, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
  • Gianfilippi G; Section of Clinical Biochemistry and School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Salvagno GL; Service of Laboratory Medicine, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
  • Lippi G; Clinical Laboratory, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 10(2): 187-192, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197316
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Since the external validation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (SARS-CoV-2 RDT-Ags) is a necessary requisite before they can be introduced into routine clinical practice, this study reports the results of a real-world assessment of the clinical performance of the new COVID-VIRO ALL IN device.

METHODS:

The study population consisted in 165 outpatients (median age 43 years, range 14-68 years; 66.1% females) who had paired nasal and nasopharyngeal samples collected upon hospital presentation. The samples were concomitantly tested with the AAZ-LMB COVID-VIRO ALL IN SARS-CoV-2 RDT-Ag and with Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS:

The number of subjects with positive RT-PCR results (i.e., mean Ct value <45) was 116 (70.3%), 109 (66.1%) and 86 (52.1%) with mean Ct values <37 and <30, respectively. In all RT-PCR positive samples, COVID-VIRO ALL IN displayed 78.8% agreement, 0.698 sensitivity, 1.000 specificity, 0.583 negative predictive value (NPV) and 1.000 positive predictive value (PPV) compared to RT-PCR. The median Ct value of samples testing positive with COVID-VIRO ALL IN was significantly lower than those testing negative (22.8 vs. 32.2; p<0.001). In samples with high viral load (i.e., Ct value <30), COVID-VIRO ALL IN displayed 92.1% agreement, 0.895 sensitivity, 0.949 specificity, 0.983 NPV and 0.951 PPV compared to RT-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the diagnostic performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN do not exactly match those of the manufacturer, its high NPV in high viral load samples would enable fast-track and rapid identification of highly contagious subjects.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Dx-2022-0138

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Dx-2022-0138