Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Stillbirth occurrence during COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based prospective study.
Salerno, Cristina; Donno, Valeria; Melis, Beatrice; Perrone, Enrica; Menichini, Daniela; Facchinetti, Fabio; Monari, Francesca.
  • Salerno C; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Donno V; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Melis B; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Perrone E; International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Menichini D; Primary Care Service, Regional Health Authority of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Facchinetti F; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Monari F; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother-Infant and Adult Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
J Perinat Med ; 50(6): 653-659, 2022 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197357
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Data collected worldwide on stillbirth (SB) rates during the Covid-19 pandemic are contradictory. Variations may be due to methodological differences or population characteristics. The aim of the study is to assess the changes in SB rate, risk factors, causes of death and quality of antenatal care during the pandemic compared to the control periods.

METHODS:

This prospective study is based on the information collected by the Emilia-Romagna Surveillance system database. We conducted a descriptive analysis of SB rate, risk factors, causes of death and quality of cares, comparing data of the pandemic (March 2020-June 2021) with the 16 months before.

RESULTS:

During the pandemic, the SB rate was 3.45/1,000 births, a value in line with the rates of previous control periods. Neonatal weight >90th centile was the only risk factor for SB that significantly changed during the pandemic (2.2% vs. 8.0%; p-value 0.024). No significant differences were found in the distribution of the causes of death groups. Concerning quality of antenatal cares, cases evaluated with suboptimal care (5.2%) did not change significantly compared to the control period (12.0%), as well as the cases with less than recommended obstetric (12.6% vs. 14%) and ultrasound evaluations (0% vs. 2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, no significant differences in SB rates were found in an area that maintained an adequate level of antenatal care. Thus, eventual associations between SB rate and the COVID-19 infection are explained by an indirect impact of the virus, rather than its direct effect.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stillbirth / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: J Perinat Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jpm-2022-0129

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stillbirth / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: J Perinat Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jpm-2022-0129