Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Promoting college students' systems thinking in asynchronous discussions: Encouraging students initiating questions.
Yu, Yawen; Chen, Gaowei; Tao, Yang; Li, Xiaofeng; Yang, Lina; Dong, Shengwen.
  • Yu Y; Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Chen G; Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Tao Y; Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Li X; Department of Library and Information Science, Pennsylvania Western University, Clarion, PA, United States.
  • Yang L; Graduate School, Tianjin Foreign Studies University, Tianjin, China.
  • Dong S; School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Front Psychol ; 13: 1028655, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2199204
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Systems thinking is one of the most important thinking skills for medical students. Most of the studies focused on designing technological-rich learning environments which usually take several weeks or months to implement. However, the occurring of COVID-19 health crisis does not allow extensive period of time to implement classroom interventions. How to support students' systems thinking in fully online environments remains an issue. This study examines if encouraging students initiating questions on asynchronous discussion forum supports their systems thinking development.

Methods:

Twenty-two junior students participated in this study. We compared if and how students developed systems thinking when they were encouraged asking questions in asynchronous discussion forums in one unit with another unit in which traditional method was used. Multiple analytical methods were applied in this study, including, social network analysis, epistemic network analysis, inferential statistical analysis and qualitative analysis.

Results:

Quantitative results showed that all students improved systems thinking compared with traditional teaching unit among which leader students improved most. Further analysis on students' discussion posts suggested leader students asked high systems thinking level questions and provided high level responses. Epistemic network analysis unpacked how leader, regular and peripheral students engaged in initiating questions and providing responses differently.

Discussion:

This study provides methodological and practical contributions. Methodologically, this study extends prior methods of applying network analysis beyond its original preservice teacher training contexts; practically, this study provides strategies to practitioners to support students' asynchronous forum discussions.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Psychol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpsyg.2022.1028655

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Psychol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpsyg.2022.1028655