Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Hands off the Mink! Using Environmental Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in American Mink.
Boyd, Ellen; Coombe, Michelle; Prystajecky, Natalie; Caleta, Jessica M; Sekirov, Inna; Tyson, John; Himsworth, Chelsea.
  • Boyd E; Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Government of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3, Canada.
  • Coombe M; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
  • Prystajecky N; Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Government of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3, Canada.
  • Caleta JM; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
  • Sekirov I; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
  • Tyson J; BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
  • Himsworth C; BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(2)2023 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2200080
ABSTRACT
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous non-human species were shown to be susceptible to natural infection by SARS-CoV-2, including farmed American mink. Once infected, American mink can transfer the virus from mink to human and mink to mink, resulting in a high rate of viral mutation. Therefore, outbreak surveillance on American mink farms is imperative for both mink and human health. Historically, disease surveillance on mink farms has consisted of a combination of mortality and live animal sampling; however, these methodologies have significant limitations. This study compared PCR testing of both deceased and live animal samples to environmental samples on an active outbreak premise, to determine the utility of environmental sampling. Environmental sampling mirrored trends in both deceased and live animal sampling in terms of percent positivity and appeared more sensitive in some low-prevalence instances. PCR CT values of environmental samples were significantly different from live animal samples' CT values and were consistently high (mean CT = 36.2), likely indicating a low amount of viral RNA in the samples. There is compelling evidence in favour of environmental sampling for the purpose of disease surveillance, specifically as an early warning tool for SARS-CoV-2; however, further work is needed to ultimately determine whether environmental samples are viable sources for molecular epidemiology investigations.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph20021248

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph20021248