Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Aggarwal, Sahil; Wisely, C Ellis; Syed, Misha; Siatkowski, R Michael; Challa, Pratap.
  • Aggarwal S; is Chief Resident, PGY-4, Duke Eye Center.
  • Wisely CE; is Assistant Professor, Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Duke Eye Center, and Site Director, Ophthalmology Resident Service, Durham VA Medical Center.
  • Syed M; is Assistant Dean for Educational Affairs, Vice Chair for Academic Affairs, and Residency Program Director, Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology.
  • Siatkowski RM; is CEO, Chair, and Professor, Dean McGee Eye Institute, The University of Oklahoma, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology.
  • Challa P; is Professor and Residency Program Director, Duke Eye Center, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology.
J Grad Med Educ ; 14(6): 674-679, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2202256
ABSTRACT

Background:

The effect of virtual interviews on residency match outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. Examining the ophthalmology match may help inform all specialties undergoing virtual interviews.

Objective:

To determine the impact of allopathic applicant match characteristics in the first year of the virtual residency Match process.

Methods:

Using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology match database, a retrospective review was conducted of all allopathic applicants to ophthalmology residency programs in the United States from the 2016 through the 2021 match cycles. Demographic information, interview numbers, and match outcomes were compared between the 2016-2020 (in-person) and 2021 (virtual) cycles.

Results:

A total of 3343 allopathic applicants were analyzed. Applicants in the 2021 Match applied to significantly more programs than 2016-2020 applicants did (78.7±23.6 vs 73.1±22.7, P<.001). Among matched and unmatched applicants, there was no significant difference in the number of interviews granted or completed. There was a significant reduction in the match rate between the 2016-2020 and 2021 Match cycles (81.3% vs 76.6%, P=.0009). A subanalysis of applicants who went to medical schools with ophthalmology residency programs (N=2308) found that the home institution match rate was significantly higher for the 2021 Match compared to the aggregate 2016-2020 Matches (26.1% vs 20.6%, respectively, P=.015).

Conclusions:

Significantly more applicants to ophthalmology residency programs matched at their home institutions in the 2021 virtual match cycle compared to the previous 5 years without influencing the interview numbers granted and attended.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Grad Med Educ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Grad Med Educ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article