[Evaluation of two immunocromatographic tests for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2]. / Valoración de dos pruebas inmunocromatográficas para la detección de anticuerpos frente a SARS-CoV-2.
Rev Esp Quimioter
; 35(6): 538-543, 2022 Dec.
Article
in Spanish
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2206374
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Serological tests have been a valuable tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, supporting molecular methods for detection, and monitoring the immune response, caused by vaccination or by natural infection. Within all these techniques, rapid tests are interesting due to their ease of use, rapid response and low cost.METHODS:
Two different immunological techniques were evaluated Realy Tech and Mikrogen Diagnostik recomLine SARS-CoV-2 IgG. SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant antibody test and SARS-CoV-IgG assay, both from Abbott Diagnostics, were used as reference techniques.RESULTS:
Mikrogen Diagnostik recomLine SARS-CoV-2 IgG shows the best results (S=0.985; E=0.839). Three techniques offered good positive predictive values, but Realy Tech and Healgen negative predictive values left to be desired.CONCLUSIONS:
Mikrogen Diagnostik recomLine SARS-CoV-2 IgG showed good results in the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and could be used as an alternative to automated techniques.Keywords
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
SARS-CoV-2
/
COVID-19
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Experimental Studies
/
Prognostic study
Topics:
Vaccines
Limits:
Humans
Language:
Spanish
Journal:
Rev Esp Quimioter
Journal subject:
Drug Therapy
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS