Your browser doesn't support javascript.
eHealth Literacy and Patient Portal Use and Attitudes: Cross-sectional Observational Study.
Deshpande, Nikita; Arora, Vineet M; Vollbrecht, Hanna; Meltzer, David O; Press, Valerie.
  • Deshpande N; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Arora VM; Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Vollbrecht H; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Meltzer DO; Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Press V; Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
JMIR Hum Factors ; 10: e40105, 2023 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2224658
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, patient portals have become more widely used tools of patient care delivery. However, not all individuals have equivalent access or ability to use patient portals.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationships between eHealth literacy (eHL) and patient portal awareness, use, and attitudes among hospitalized patients.

METHODS:

Inpatients completed patient portal surveys; eHL was assessed (eHealth Literacy Scale). Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, self-reported race, gender, and educational attainment were completed with significance at P<.006 (Bonferroni correction).

RESULTS:

Among 274 participants, most identified as Black (n=166, 61%) and female (n=140, 51%), mean age was 56.5 (SD 16.7) years, and 178 (65%) reported some college or higher educational attainment. One-quarter (n=79, 28%) had low eHL (mean 27, SD 9.5), which was associated with lower odds of portal access awareness (odds ratio 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.23; P<.001), having ever used portals (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.10-0.36; P<.001), less perceived usefulness of portals (odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.38; P=.001), and lower likelihood of planning to use portals in the coming years (odds ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.25; P<.001). As time through the COVID-19 pandemic passed, there was a trend toward increased perceived usefulness of patient portals (53% vs 62%, P=.08), but average eHL did not increase through time (P=.81).

CONCLUSIONS:

Low eHL was associated with less awareness, use, and perceived usefulness of portals. Perceived usefulness of portals likely increased through the COVID-19 pandemic, but patients' eHL did not. Interventions tailored for patients with low eHL could ensure greater equity in health care delivery through the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 40105

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 40105