Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rationing scarce healthcare capacity: A study of the ventilator allocation guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anderson, David R; Aydinliyim, Tolga; Bjarnadóttir, Margrét V; Çil, Eren B; Anderson, Michaela R.
  • Anderson DR; School of Business Villanova University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
  • Aydinliyim T; Zicklin School of Business Baruch College, CUNY New York USA.
  • Bjarnadóttir MV; Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.
  • Çil EB; Lundquist College of Business University of Oregon Eugene Oregon USA.
  • Anderson MR; Columbia University Medical Center New York USA.
Prod Oper Manag ; 2023 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227505
ABSTRACT
In the United States, even though national guidelines for allocating scarce healthcare resources are lacking, 26 states have specific ventilator allocation guidelines to be invoked in case of a shortage. While several states developed their guidelines in response to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, New York State developed these guidelines in 2015 as "pandemic influenza is a foreseeable threat, one that we cannot ignore." The primary objective of this study is to assess the existing procedures and priority rules in place for allocating/rationing scarce ventilator capacity and propose alternative (and improved) priority schemes. We first build machine learning models using inpatient records of COVID-19 patients admitted to New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center and an affiliated community health center to predict survival probabilities as well as ventilator length-of-use. Then, we use the resulting point estimators and their uncertainties as inputs for a multiclass priority queueing model with abandonments to assess three priority schemes (i) SOFA-P (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment based prioritization), which most closely mimics the existing practice by prioritizing patients with sufficiently low SOFA scores; (ii) ISP (incremental survival probability), which assigns priority based on patient-level survival predictions; and (iii) ISP-LU (incremental survival probability per length-of-use), which takes into account survival predictions and resource use duration. Our findings highlight that our proposed priority scheme, ISP-LU, achieves a demonstrable improvement over the other two alternatives. Specifically, the expected number of survivals increases and death risk while waiting for ventilator use decreases. We also show that ISP-LU is a robust priority scheme whose implementation yields a Pareto-improvement over both SOFA-P and ISP in terms of maximizing saved lives after mechanical ventilation while limiting racial disparity in access to the priority queue.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article