Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences.
Bosó Pérez, Raquel; Reid, David; Maxwell, Karen J; Gibbs, Jo; Dema, Emily; Bonell, Christopher; Mercer, Catherine H; Sonnenberg, Pam; Field, Nigel; Mitchell, Kirstin R.
  • Bosó Pérez R; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK r.boso-perez.1@research.gla.ac.uk.
  • Reid D; The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections in partnership with Public Health England, University College London, London, UK.
  • Maxwell KJ; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Gibbs J; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Dema E; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Bonell C; Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Mercer CH; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Sonnenberg P; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Field N; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Mitchell KR; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health ; 2022 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228273
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery.

RESULTS:

Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and 'socially-distanced' services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care.

CONCLUSION:

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants' accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjsrh-2021-201413

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjsrh-2021-201413