Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody lateral flow assay for antibody prevalence studies following vaccination: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Cann, Alexandra; Clarke, Candice; Brown, Jonathan; Thomson, Tina; Prendecki, Maria; Moshe, Maya; Badhan, Anjna; Simmons, Bryony; Klaber, Bob; Elliott, Paul; Darzi, Ara; Riley, Steven; Ashby, Deborah; Martin, Paul; Gleeson, Sarah; Willicombe, Michelle; Kelleher, Peter; Ward, Helen; Barclay, Wendy S; Cooke, Graham S.
  • Cann A; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Clarke C; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Brown J; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Thomson T; Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Prendecki M; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Moshe M; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Badhan A; Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Simmons B; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Klaber B; Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Elliott P; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Darzi A; Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Riley S; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Ashby D; LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
  • Martin P; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Gleeson S; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Willicombe M; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Kelleher P; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Ward H; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Barclay WS; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Cooke GS; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Wellcome Open Res ; 6: 358, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228543
ABSTRACT

Background:

Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) are able to achieve affordable, large scale antibody testing and provide rapid results without the support of central laboratories. As part of the development of the REACT programme extensive evaluation of LFIA performance was undertaken with individuals following natural infection. Here we assess the performance of the selected LFIA to detect antibody responses in individuals who have received at least one dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine.

Methods:

This was a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Sampling was carried out at renal outpatient clinic and healthcare worker testing sites at Imperial College London NHS Trust. Two cohorts of patients were recruited; the first was a cohort of 108 renal transplant patients attending clinic following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the second cohort comprised 40 healthcare workers attending for first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and subsequent follow up. During the participants visit, finger-prick blood samples were analysed on LFIA device, while paired venous sampling was sent for serological assessment of antibodies to the spike protein (anti-S) antibodies. Anti-S IgG was detected using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG Quant II CMIA. A total of 186 paired samples were collected. The accuracy of Fortress LFIA in detecting IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 compared to anti-spike protein detection on Abbott Assay

Results:

The LFIA had an estimated sensitivity of 92.0% (114/124; 95% confidence interval [CI] 85.7% to 96.1%) and specificity of 93.6% (58/62; 95% CI 84.3% to 98.2%) using the Abbott assay as reference standard (using the threshold for positivity of 7.10 BAU/ml)

Conclusions:

Fortress LFIA performs well in the detection of antibody responses for intended purpose of population level surveillance but does not meet criteria for individual testing.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wellcomeopenres.17231.2

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wellcomeopenres.17231.2