Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Snacking and anxiety during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A prospective cohort study.
Curtin, Esther L; Johnson, Laura; Salway, Ruth; Hinton, Elanor C.
  • Curtin EL; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Electronic address: esther.curtin@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Johnson L; Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK; NatCen Social Research, 35 Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0AX, UK. Electronic address: laura.johnson@natcen.ac.uk.
  • Salway R; Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, BS8 1TZ, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: ruth.salway@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Hinton EC; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Nutrition Theme, University of Bristol, BS2 8AE, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: elanor.hinton@bristol.ac.uk.
Appetite ; 183: 106491, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229181
ABSTRACT
Anxiety and snacking increased during the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns, but it remains unknown whether this change in snacking persisted and if it related to anxiety levels. We used prospective data to examine changes in snacking frequency from t1 (eased restrictions in England in May-June 2020) to t2 (national lockdown in December 2020-March 2021), the association of anxiety (assessed by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire at t1) with the snacking change, and the mediating and moderating effects of disinhibition and flexible restraint (assessed by the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire in 2016-17). Analyses including 2128 adults (mean age 28.4 y) residing in England from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children showed that snacking frequency increased over time (mean change 1.23 (95% CI 0.81, 1.65) snacks/wk). Linear regressions of snacking adjusted for sociodemographic covariates showed that having clinical levels of generalised anxiety at t1, versus not, was associated with 1.22 (95% CI 0.07, 2.37) more snacks/wk at t2. Disinhibition partially mediated the association between Generalised Anxiety Disorder and snacking (ßindirect = 0.15, 95% CI 0.01, 0.32), while there was no evidence that flexible restraint moderated the association (ß = 0.05, 95% CI -0.57, 0.66). Our longitudinal findings highlight a detrimental anxiety-snacking association partly operating via disinhibition, suggesting future research could target mitigating anxiety and disinhibited eating behaviours to benefit diet-related outcomes following the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Snacks / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Appetite Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Snacks / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Appetite Year: 2023 Document Type: Article